Innovative Structural Evaluation of a Dual-Function Cane for Elderly Mobility: A Finite Element Analysis Approach Using SolidWorks

Hadad Rafana, Apip Amrullah, Ma'ruf Ma'ruf, Rizal Mahmud

Abstract


The increasing proportion of elderly individuals globally underscores the need for safe and ergonomic mobility aids that support independent living and enhance quality of life. This study presents a structural analysis of a multifunctional walking cane prototype, NeoMossa, which integrates an umbrella mechanism, aimed at addressing both mobility and environmental protection needs for elderly users. The analysis employed the Finite Element Method (FEM) using SolidWorks simulation software to evaluate the mechanical performance of the cane under static loading conditions of 300 N, 500 N, and 700 N. Key parameters assessed included Von Mises stress, strain, displacement, and factor of safety. The results demonstrated that all measured values remained within acceptable limits, with the highest stress recorded at 75.98 MPa and a minimum safety factor of 1.72 under the maximum load. These findings confirm that the cane structure is capable of withstanding typical user loads without risk of mechanical failure. The study affirms the feasibility of integrating multifunctional features into assistive devices without compromising structural safety, contributing valuable insight to the design and development of innovative mobility aids for the elderly.


Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

S. Malwade et al., “Mobile and Wearable Technologies in Healthcare for the Ageing Population,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 161, pp. 233–237, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.026.

A. Woodcock, L. Moody, D. McDonagh, A. Jain, and L. C. Jain, “Design of Assistive Technology for Ageing Populations,” 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-26292-1.

K. Halicka and D. Surel, “Gerontechnology — New Opportunities in the Service of Older Adults,” Eng. Manag. Prod. Serv., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 114–126, 2021, doi: 10.2478/emj-2021-0025.

Y. Morsi, A. Shukla, and C. P. Rathore, “Optimizing Assistive Technologies for Aging Populations,” 2016, doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9530-6.

P. Asgharian, A. M. Panchea, and F. Ferland, “A Review on the Use of Mobile Service Robots in Elderly Care,” Robotics, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 127, 2022, doi: 10.3390/robotics11060127.

S. Sarcar et al., “Designing Mobile Interactions for the Ageing Populations,” 2017, doi: 10.1145/3027063.3027074.

K. K. Santhanaraj, R. M.M., and D. Dinakaran, “A Survey of Assistive Robots and Systems for Elderly Care,” J. Enabling Technol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 66–72, 2021, doi: 10.1108/jet-10-2020-0043.

N. Yein and S. Pal, “Technological Assistance for Fall Among Aging Population: A Review,” pp. 409–419, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_36.

J. d. Armas, J. Rodríguez‐Pereira, B. Vieira, and H. Ramalhinho, “Optimizing Assistive Technology Operations for Aging Populations,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 6925, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13126925.

T. YOKOYAMA, S. IZUMI, and S. Sakai, “Analytical Modelling of the Mechanical Behavior of Bolted Joint Subjected to Transverse Loading,” J. Solid Mech. Mater. Eng., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1427–1443, 2010, doi: 10.1299/jmmp.4.1427.

C. Y. Wang, M. Du, M. Zheng, and Q. Sun, “Study on the Stress Evolution at Threads of Bolted Joint Under Transverse Loads,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 239, no. 6, pp. 2106–2116, 2024, doi: 10.1177/09544062241292858.

D. Y. H. Kumarajati, “Design and Analysis of 3D Printable Prosthetic Foot With Honeycomb Structure,” Appl. Sci. Technol. Reaserch J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 92–99, 2023, doi: 10.31316/astro.v2i2.5628.

A. M. Halahla, “Study the Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beam Using Finite Element Analysis,” 2018, doi: 10.11159/icsenm18.103.

D. D. Kée and K. F. Wissbrun, “Polymer Rheology,” Phys. Today, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 24–29, 1998, doi: 10.1063/1.882283.

W. P. Davey, “The Plasticity of Solids,” J. Rheol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 1929, doi: 10.1122/1.2116292.

A. V. Orekhov, “Statistical Criteria for the Limits of Application of Hooke’s Law,” Vestn. St. Petersburg Univ. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. Control Process., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 391–401, 2020, doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu10.2020.404.

D. Hodžić and E. Veladžić, “Experimental and Analytical Deformation Analysis of Truss Members,” Iop Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1298, no. 1, p. 012033, 2023, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1298/1/012033.

S. S. Karganroudi, J.-C. Cuillière, V. François, and A. Tahan, “Assessment of the Robustness of a Fixtureless Inspection Method for Nonrigid Parts Based on a Verification and Validation Approach,” J. Verification Valid. Uncertain. Quantif., vol. 2, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1115/1.4038917.

W. L. Oberkampf, T. G. Trucano, and C. Hirsch, “Verification, Validation, and Predictive Capability in Computational Engineering and Physics,” Appl. Mech. Rev., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 345–384, 2004, doi: 10.1115/1.1767847.

E. D. Purnomo et al., “The Prediction of Stress and Safety Factor of Shock Absorber Based on Cyclic Loading Using Finite Element Method,” Evergreen, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2456–2463, 2023, doi: 10.5109/7162006.

M. Alardhi, F. Almaskari, M. Fahed, and J. Alrajhi, “Analysis of a Lightweight Aluminum Vehicle Chassis in a Simulation-Based Design Approach,” Glob. J. Res. Eng., pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.34257/gjrejvol20is1pg1.

D. Magisano, L. Leonetti, and G. Garcea, “Shakedown Analysis of 3D Frames Under Multiple Load Combinations Using Mixed Fiber Beam Elements,” 2021, doi: 10.23967/complas.2021.058.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31284/j.jmesi.2025.v5i1.7649

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.