CFD-Validated Kriging Surrogate for Multi Objective Aerodynamic Optimization of a Go-Kart Drag–Lift Pareto Front under Pitching Moment Constraint

Ahmad Al Kafi, Ahmad Atif Fikri

Abstract


Go-kart aerodynamics involves a trade-off between drag reduction, lift control, and longitudinal stability, yet most previous studies do not explicitly constrain pitching moment during design optimization. This study proposes a CFD-validated Gaussian Process Regression (Kriging) surrogate for multi objective aerodynamic optimization of go-kart bodywork using ground clearance, nose angle, and operating speed as design variables. A 25-point maximin Latin hypercube design was evaluated using steady RANS CFD, and the surrogate was used to construct a drag-lift Pareto front under an uncertainty-aware pitching moment constraint at 65 km/h. The recommended knee point design (h = 40 mm, α = 24.79°) achieved Cd = 0.771, Cl = 0.157, and Cm.pitch = 0.171. Compared with the baseline, it reduced lift and pitching moment by about 35% each, with a 4.6% drag penalty. Additional CFD checks at 42 and 89 km/h confirmed that the selected design remained feasible and stable across the operating range. These results demonstrate that surrogate-assisted, stability-constrained optimization can identify practically viable go-kart configurations that improve aerodynamic stability without a large drag penalty, providing a useful framework for bodywork tuning within the studied design range.


Full Text:

PDF

References


F. H. Emon and A. Rahman, “Study the Aerodynamic Behaviors of a Go-Kart by using CFD Analysis,” presented at the International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Materials Engineering 2024 (ICMIME2024), 2024.

M. AL-Rawi and A. Oumssount, “One-Way Fluid Structure Interaction of a Go-Kart Spoiler Using CFD Analysis,” in The 13th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, MDPI, Jun. 2020, p. 51. doi: 10.3390/proceedings2020049051.

M. E. Biancolini, C. Del Bene, T. Larsson, et al., “Evaluation of go-kart aerodynamic efficiency using CFD, RBF mesh morphing and lap time simulation,” vol. 5, no. 3-4, 2017, doi: 10.1504/IJAD.2016.083375.

F. F. Semeraro and P. Schito, “Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Tire Deformation and Vehicle Ride Height on the Aerodynamics of Passenger Cars,” Fluids, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 47, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/fluids7020047.

M. Aultman, Z. Wang, R. Auza-Gutierrez, et al., “Evaluation of CFD methodologies for prediction of flows around simplified and complex automotive models,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 236, p. 105297, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105297.

C. Zhang, C. P. Bounds, L. Foster, et al., “Turbulence Modeling Effects on the CFD Predictions of Flow over a Detailed Full-Scale Sedan Vehicle,” Fluids, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 148, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.3390/fluids4030148.

F. F. Buscariolo, G. R. S. Assi, and S. J. Sherwin, “Computational study on an Ahmed Body equipped with simplified underbody diffuser,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 209, p. 104411, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104411.

H. Zhou, W. Zhang, T. Huang, et al., “Numerical Analysis of the Aerodynamic Performance of an Ahmed Body Fitted with Spoilers of Different Opening Areas,” Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1113-1131, 2025, doi: 10.32604/fdmp.2025.064991.

A. Marrel and B. Iooss, “Probabilistic surrogate modeling by Gaussian process: A review on recent insights in estimation and validation,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 247, p. 110094, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110094.

J. P. C. Kleijnen, “Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 1-16, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.041.

D. Zhan and H. Xing, “Expected improvement for expensive optimization: a review,” J. Glob. Optim., vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 507-544, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10898-020-00923-x.

X. Hu, P. Ma, S. Li, et al., “The Optimization of Space-Filling and Orthogonality for Latin Hypercube Design Using a Local Search-Based NSGA-II,” J. Stat. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 12, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s42519-025-00430-w.

L. Wang, Q. Xiao, and H. Xu, “Optimal maximin L1-distance Latin hypercube designs based on good lattice point designs,” Ann. Stat., vol. 46, no. 6B, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1214/17-AOS1674.

J. Yang, H. Chen, D. K. J. Lin, et al., “Construction of sliced maximin-orthogonal Latin hypercube designs,” Stat. Sin., 2016, doi: 10.5705/ss.2013.352.

B. Shahriari, K. Swersky, Z. Wang, et al., “Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 148-175, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2494218.

F. Berkenkamp, A. Krause, and A. P. Schoellig, “Bayesian optimization with safety constraints: safe and automatic parameter tuning in robotics,” Mach. Learn., vol. 112, no. 10, pp. 3713-3747, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10994-021-06019-1.

“The k-ω Shear-Stress Transport (SST) Turbulence Model,” in A New Hypothesis on the Anisotropic Reynolds Stress Tensor for Turbulent Flows, vol. 120, in Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 120. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 57-66. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-13543-0_3.

H. Ma, Y. Zhang, S. Sun, et al., “A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 15217-15270, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10526-z.

O. Cuate and O. Schütze, “Pareto Explorer for Finding the Knee for Many Objective Optimization Problems,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 1651, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/math8101651.

E. Ruban.L, I. V. Kennet Thomas, L. M. Dicson .V, D. B.S, et al., “A Study on the effect of fairing designs of Go Kart on its performance using CFD analysis,” Int. Res. J. Adv., vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 21-29, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.47392/irjash.2020.142.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:
Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Indonesia

Editorial Address
Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Science, and Innovation is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0