Penerapan Quality Function Deployment untuk Merancang Rumah Tinggal Generasi Milenial
Abstract
The necessity of adequate housing constitutes a fundamental human need. CV Senjaya Makmur, a housing developer in Sidoarjo, faces the challenge of meeting the housing preferences of the millennial generation. The objective of this study is to ascertain the technical attributes required by millennial consumers to inform the design of residential houses. To this end, the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method will be employed as a framework. The results of the study indicated that the factors considered by millennials include facade color, simple and trendy home design, construction cost, breathing house concept, distance to public facilities, long-term use, efficiency, and flexibility. The highest priorities are the cost of home maintenance (8.513%), the application of easy-care materials (8.494%), and cheap good quality finishing materials (8.329%). Other salient characteristics include optimal furniture arrangement (5.737%), integration of multifunctional spaces (5.508%), and the notion of multi-storey micro-houses (5.453%). These findings offer insights that can inform the design of residential properties to align with the needs and preferences of the millennial generation.
Kebutuhan tempat tinggal layak merupakan kebutuhan primer manusia. CV Senjaya Makmur sebagai developer perumahan di Sidoarjo menghadapi tantangan memenuhi preferensi rumah generasi milenial. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi atribut teknis yang dibutuhkan konsumen milenial sebagai acuan perancangan rumah tinggal menggunakan metode Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan faktor-faktor yang dipertimbangkan milenial meliputi warna fasad, desain rumah simple dan trendy, biaya pembangunan, konsep rumah bernafas, jarak dengan fasilitas publik, penggunaan jangka panjang, efisiensi dan fleksibilitas. Prioritas tertinggi adalah biaya perawatan rumah (8,513%), penerapan material mudah perawatan (8,494%), dan material finishing murah berkualitas baik (8,329%). Karakteristik penting lainnya mencakup penataan furniture yang baik (5,737%), gabungan beberapa fungsi ruang (5,508%), dan konsep rumah mikro bertingkat (5,453%). Temuan ini memberikan masukan bagi pengembang untuk merancang rumah sesuai kebutuhan generasi milenial.
References
A. Chastonay and O. Chastonay, “Housing Risk Factors of Four Tropical Neglected Diseases: A Brief Review of the Recent Literature,” Trop. Med. Infect. Dis., vol. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7070143.
B. Thiele, “The human right to adequate housing: a tool for promoting and protecting individual and community health.,” Am. J. Public Health, vol. 92 5, pp. 712–715, 2002, doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.5.712.
L. Fomina, “To the question of understanding the right to adequate housing: an international legal aspect.,” Anal. Comp. Jurisprud., 2022, doi: 10.24144/2788-6018.2022.05.84.
M. Sobantu, “Social Rental Housing and Empowerment: Voices of Beneficiaries from Gauteng, South Africa,” South. African J. Soc. Work Soc. Dev., 2022, doi: 10.25159/2708-9355/7222.
R. Mehdipanah, “Without Affordable, Accessible, and Adequate Housing, Health Has No Foundation,” Milbank Q., vol. 101, pp. 419–443, 2023, doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12626.
J. Adianto, R. Gabe, and M. Farraz, “The influence of family relations on the housing preferences of Millennials in Depok, Indonesia,” J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain., vol. 16, pp. 84–100, 2021, doi: 10.1080/17549175.2021.1944282.
Y. Lee, G. Circella, P. Mokhtarian, and S. Guhathakurta, “Heterogeneous residential preferences among millennials and members of generation X in California: A latent-class approach,” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.001.
Y. Mulyano, R. Rahadi, and U. Amaliah, “Millennials Housing Preferences Model in Jakarta,” Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res., 2020, doi: 10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.1.240.
I. P. B. Ariyuda, I. N. G. M. Putra, and N. W. M. Mustika, “Potensi Pengembangan Co-housing Sebagai Tipologi Hunian Masyarakat Milenial Dengan Strategi Pendekatan Arsitektur Tumbuh Di Kota Denpasar,” Undagi J. Ilm. Jur. Arsit. Univ. Warmadewa, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 76–84, 2021.
D. D. Wijaya and N. Anastasia, “Pertimbangan Generasi Milenial Pada Kepemilikan Rumah Dan Kendala Finansial,” J. Manaj. Aset Dan Penilai, vol. 1, no. 2, 2021.
E. Mochtario and M. Effendy, “Penerapan Rumah Subsidi Dengan Konsep Rumah Tumbuh Di Era Milenial,” in Seminar Keinsinyuran Program Studi Program Profesi Insinyur, 2022.
N. Hidayah and R. Rahmawati, “Millennial Generation Intentions in Choosing Housing: Comparison of Sharia and General Housing,” Proc. 7th Int. Colloq. Interdiscip. Islam. Stud. conjunction with 6th Annu. Postgrad. Conf. Muslim Soc. (APCoMS), ICIIS APCoMS 2024, 17–18 June 2024, Banjarmasin, Indones., 2024, doi: 10.4108/eai.17-6-2024.2349064.
S. Mangkunegara, N. Nurdiani, and W. Katarina, “The study of millennial needs and willingness to share living space in Jakarta, Indonesia,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 794, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012166.
N. R. Amalia and R. Nadlifatin, “Millennial Generation Preferences in Selection of Residentials in Jabodetabek Area,” J. Teknobisnis, 2024, doi: 10.12962/j24609463.v9i1.931.
T. Ferdiansyah, A. Bastian, and M. R. Abdillah, “FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI GENERASI Y/NETGEN/MILLENIAL DALAM PEMILIHAN RUMAH SAKIT,” PROCEEDING IAIN Batusangkar, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 201–205, 2022.
R. E. S. M. Redjo, M. Wijayaningtyas, and T. Iskandar, “Keputusan pembelian rumah generasi milenial kota malang,” INFOMANPRO, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2019.
M. Wijayaningtyas and T. H. Nainggolan, “PERILAKU GENERASI MILENIAL TERHADAP EFISIENSI ENERGI PADA RUMAH TINGGAL DENGAN KONSEP GREEN BUILDING”.
E. Prianto, “Strategi disain fasad rumah tinggal hemat energi,” J. Riptek, Bappeda Kota Semarang, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2012.
A. A. Utami and D. S. Hariyani, “Hubungan Karakter Milenial dengan Persepsi Visual Desain Fasad Rumah untuk Generasi Milenial di Graha Raya”.
V. Moghimi, M. M. Jusan, P. Izadpanahi, and J. Mahdinejad, “Incorporating user values into housing design through indirect user participation using MEC-QFD model,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 9, pp. 76–83, 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2016.11.012.
I. Dikmen, M. Birgonul, and S. Kiziltas, “Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry,” Build. Environ., vol. 40, pp. 245–255, 2005, doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2004.07.001.
L. Gargione, “Using Quality Function Deployment (Qfd) in the Design Phase of an Apartment Construction Project,” pp. 357–368, 1999, [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/using-quality-function-deployment-qfd-in-the-design-phase-gargione/2d81b42e2f995749be73b936c07ce9c3/
M. Iqbal, “APLIKASI METODE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD) DALAM RANCANGAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN PROYEK DENAH RUMAH TIPE 45/100 DI PERUMAHAN TAMAN CIBADUYUT INDAH,” Universitas Komputer Indonesia, 2005.
C. Fajri, “Perancangan Shelter Bus Mebidang Dengan Menggunakan Quality Function Deployment (QFD),” J. Sist. Tek. Ind., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2020.
A. Alexander, D. Wahjudi, and J. Budiman, “Analisis Kebutuhan Konsumen Dan Rekomendasi Perancangan Perumahan Dengan Luas Bangunan 36-70 M2,” Dimens. Utama Tek. Sipil, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2015.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
12.png)



_(1)_(1)1.png)
1.png)
_(1)1.png)