Perancangan Sistem Informasi Daerah Aliran Sungai Terpadu Kepulauan Riau

Diana Azizah, Febrianti Lestari, Dony Apdillah, M. Radzi Rathomi, Deni Sabriyati, Dimas Nugraha Pamungkas

Abstract

Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Daerah aliran sungai (DAS) diperlukan sebagai wadah untuk informasi dan koordinasi lintas stakeholder yang mengelola wilayah sungai. Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji bermitra dengan Badan Perencanaan, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Provinsi, Kepulauan Riau merancang Dashboard Sistem Informasi DAS Terpadu (SIPDAST) Kepulauan Riau yang dilaksanakan melalui proses diskusi terpumpun (focus group discussion) untuk menjaring data dan informasi potensi, isu dan konflik pengelolaan DAS di wilayah Kepulauan Riau yang berfokus pada Pulau Bintan, Batam, Karimun, Natuna dan Lingga. Kegiatan ini dilaksanakan selama bulan Oktober hingga November 2024 di Batam. Hasil rancangan dashboard SIPDAST Kepulauan Riau di antaranya terdapat navigasi-bar yang berisi atribut/fitur beranda, karakteristik DAS secara biogeofisik dan sosial, peta, karakteristik, perencanaan, monitoring serta pengaduan. Hasil dari perancangan dashboard ini dikelola oleh Bappeda Kepulauan Riau sebagai administrator sedangkan Balai Pengelolaan DAS Sei Jang Duriangkang Kepulauan Riau menjadi user. SIPDAST ini menjadi akselerasi keberlanjutan sumber daya air melalui smart integrated watershed management berbasis karakteristik Kepulauan Riau berupa landscape dan seascape kawasan pesisir dan pulau-pulau kecil. Masih belum semua kawasan DAS di wilayah Kepulauan Riau yang diinput dalam sistem informasi ini sehingga diperlukan keberlanjutan dari program ini yang diharapkan dapat menjangkau kawasan DAS seluruh pulau di Kepulauan Riau.

Keywords

Dashboard; FGD; Kepulauan Riau; Sungai

Full Text:

PDF

References

J. D. Joseph and W. Ganpat, “Stakeholders’ Perception and Willingness to Collaborate for Effective Watershed Management in Trinidad,” RISUS - J. Innov. Sustain., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3–16, 2018, doi: 10.24212/2179-3565.2018V9I3P3-16.

C. Kinati, “Role of integrating beekeeping with water shade management in Ethiopia,” Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 5, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.31893/multirev.2022004.

A. Dhiaulhaq, K. Wiset, R. Thaworn, S. Kane, and D. Gritten, “Forest, water and people: The roles and limits of mediation in transforming watershed conflict in Northern Thailand,” For. Soc., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 121–136, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2049.

N. G. R. Saumyarathna, E. R. N. Gunawardena1, and N. D. K. Dayawansa, “Water Conflicts among Different Water Users and Uses in the Hakwatuna Oya Watershed in the Deduru Oya Basin, Sri Lanka,” Trop. Agric. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 38–49, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.4038/TAR.V28I1.8182.

T. F. Fabrice, K.-W. A. Brice, D. Ali, Y. A. Berthe, K. T. J. Jacques, and K. Mahamadou, “Spatial Analysis of the Mode of Management and Conflicts of Use of Water Resources in the Watershed of the Lobo River in Nibehibe (Central-Western Côte d’Ivoire),” J. Geogr. Environ. Earth Sci. Int., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 25–38, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2020/v24i730241.

I. Kim and S. Arnhold, “Mapping environmental land use conflict potentials and ecosystem services in agricultural watersheds,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 630, pp. 827–838, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.176.

N. Avriel-Avni, Y. Rofè, and F. Scheinkman-Shachar, “Spatial Modeling of Landscape Values: Discovering the Boundaries of Conflicts and Identifying Mutual Benefits as a Basis for Land Management,” Soc. Nat. Resour., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 553–570, 2020, doi: 10.1080/08941920.2020.1850957.

H. Park and J. Jung, “Mediating Water Resource Protection Areas Using GIS-Based Watershed Analysis : A Case Study on Water Resources in Hoedong, Busan,” J. Environ. Policy Adm., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 99–119, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2018.26.2.99.

A. S. Pambudi, “Environmental land use conflicts and ecosystem services: a paper review,” Indones. J. Appl. Environ. Stud., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 58–63, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33751/injast.v4i2.7851.

J. Gheuens, N. Nagabhatla, and E. D. P. Perera, “Disaster-Risk, Water Security Challenges and Strategies in Small Island Developing States (SIDS),” Water, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 637, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/W11040637.

A. S. Jam and J. Mosaffaie, “Introducing the concept of a ladder of watershed management: A stimulus to promote watershed management approaches,” Environ. Sci. Policy, vol. 147, pp. 315–325, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.07.001.

S. Andarmoyo, “The Use of Focus Group Discussion Method in Nursing Research,” in Proceedings of the U-Go Healthy International Conference, U-Go Healthy 2020, EUDL (European Union Digital Library), 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-3-2020.2315340.

G. Adekola and E. S. Olumati, “No Title,” Int. J. Res. Innov. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 392–399, 2023, doi: 10.47772/ijriss.2023.70533.

T. O.Nyumba, K. Wilson, C. J. Derrick, and N. Mukherjee, “The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation,” Methods Ecol. Evol., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 20–32, 2018, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12860.

H. B. Basnet, “Focus Group Discussion: A Tool For Qualitative Inquiry,” Res. A Res. J. Cult. Soc., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 81–88, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/RESEARCHER.V3I3.21553.

E. Satmaidi, A. A. Muthia, and Wulandari, “Konsep Hukum Pengelolaan Tambang Batubara Berkelanjutan Berdasarkan Pendekatan Daerah Aliran Sungai (Das) Di Provinsi Bengkulu,” J. Bina Huk. Lingkung., vol. 2, no. 2, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.24970/BHL.V2I2.58.

A. Zevri and F. Isma, “Studi Keseimbangan Air (Water Balanced) Daerah Aliran Sungai Asahan,” TERAS J. J. Tek. Sipil, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.29103/TJ.V11I1.308.

H. Nuryahya, “Weak Land Management as a Cause of Mining Land Overlap,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Anal., vol. 04, pp. 1789–1794, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v4-i12-03.

S. R. Ningsih, E. G. E. Putra, and F. Goembira, “Analisis Ketersediaan, Kebutuhan dan Kualitas Air Pada DAS Batang Merao,” J. Ilmu Lingkung., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 545–555, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/JIL.18.3.545-555.

K. S. Lestari and Henderi, “Model Dashboard Information System Untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Pengelolaan Jurnal Ilmiah,” J. Ilm. MATRI, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.33557/jurnalmatrik.v23i2.1405.

M. Lubis, F. Dennis, R. Andreswari, and A. R. Lubis, “Dashboard information system development as visualization of transaction reports in the application BackInd (backpacker reservation system),” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 801, 2nd Talenta Conference on Engineering, Science and Technology 17 October 2019, Medan, Indonesia, IOP Publishing Ltd, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/801/1/012145.

M. Ropianto, A. R. Basar, and D. Hermanto, “Perancangan Dashboard Sebagai Sistem Informasi Di Dinas Perumahan Rakyat, Pemukiman Dan Pertamanan Kota Batam,” JR J. Responsive Tek. Inform., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.36352/jr.v2i2.158.

J. Feldman, L. Martin, J. Bradley, C. Walter, and V. Gujral, “Developing a Dashboard Interface to Display Assessment of Hazards and Risks to sUAS Flights,” in AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-3462.

O. Lezhnina, G. Kismihók, M. Prinz, M. Stocke, and S. Auer, “A Scholarly Knowledge Graph-Powered Dashboard: Implementation and User Evaluation,” Front. Res. Metrics Anal., vol. 7, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.934930.

A. P. Suarez and S. Popelka, “Design Aspects for COVID-19 Dashboards – Evidence from Eye-Tracking Evaluation,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 40, no. 22, pp. 7800–7818, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2272078.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31284/j.jpp-iptek.2025.v9i2.6882

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.