THE APPLICATION OF ICONIC DESIGN IN THE ARCHITECTURAL FORM OF THE VELODROME SPORT CENTER IN SURABAYA

Aditya Aditya, sigit hadi laksono, Ika Ratniarsih

Abstract


The development of iconic architecture has become an essential approach in creating buildings that not only serve functional needs but also embody symbolic identity. The Velodrome Sport Center in West Surabaya is designed as an architectural landmark that reflects the spirit of modern cycling sports while adopting a postmodern theme with a macro concept of hi-tech architecture. The oval form of the building is derived from the transformation of a bicycle helmet, symbolizing speed, safety, and aerodynamic efficiency, making the structure both visually dynamic and contextually meaningful.

The research method applies a qualitative-descriptive approach through literature studies on iconic architecture, postmodern theory, and hi-tech principles. Site analysis and conceptual synthesis are conducted to align the design with the physical context, user activity, and symbolic representation. The study emphasizes the relationship between structure, form, and material—particularly the use of exposed structural elements and ACP panel facades that highlight technological expression and aesthetic identity.

The result presents a Velodrome design that stands as an architectural icon for Surabaya. The application of an oval dynamic form supported by a hi-tech structural system creates a monumental yet functional space that enhances aerodynamic performance and visual distinctiveness. Through its exposed structure and material expression, the building achieves a strong postmodern identity, representing innovation and symbolizing the progressive image of the city.


Keywords


postmodern architecture, hi-tech architecture, iconic design, velodrome, cycling sports center, architectural identity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abusaada, H. (2024). Stimulating architects' mental imagery: metaphors, analogies and design innovation. Design Studies Journal, 45, 102–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2024.01.005

Alaily-Mattar, N. (2024). Visuality peaks, function lasts: An empirical investigation into the performance of iconic architecture on Instagram. Architectural Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-02-2024-0072

Al-Kodmany, K. (2025). High-performance tall buildings: technologies, materials and facade innovations — a review. Buildings, 5(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5020053

Al-Sabbagh, N. (2025). Evaluating types of aluminium composite panels for facade performance in hot climates: thermal and energy simulations. Egyptian Journal of Building Engineering, 41, 112–130. https://journals.ekb.eg/article_401402.pdf

Bal, W. (2023). The importance of architectural icons for urban identity: perception and evaluation in a mid-sized city. Sustainability, 15(11), 8648. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118648

Brozovsky, J. (2024). Digital technologies in architecture, engineering and construction: adoption, impacts and design implications. Automation in Construction, 145, 104123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.104123

Cocho-Bermejo, A. (2025). Adaptive architectural facades: comparative analysis of dynamic facade systems (1985–2024). Nexus Network Journal, 27(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-025-00831-1

Cucuzzella, C. (2022). The evolution of the architectural facade since 1950: typologies and contemporary practices. Facade Studies Quarterly, 3(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/facades.2022.001

Hasnat, M. R., Hassan, M. K., & Saha, S. (2025). A comprehensive review of aluminium composite panels: properties, fire behaviour, and future directions. Journal of Composite Science, 9(7), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9070319

Jiang, B. (2024). The status quo of architecture and its impact on urban morphology: recent tendencies and debates. Journal of Urban Design and Development, 12(3), 215–234. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2226585624001146

Tenório, M., & Colleagues. (2024). Contemporary strategies for the structural design of multi-span and long-span buildings: trends and innovations. Applied Sciences, 14(8), 3194. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083194

Vasseghipanah, B. (2024). Techno-aesthetics in architectural discourses: a state of the art review. Technology and Innovation in Architecture, 8(2), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techarch.2024.04.011




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31284/j.jcepd.2026.v5i1.8317

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.