Identification of Stakeholder Involvement in Decision-Making Needs (Case Study: Sanur Port Construction Project)

Heru Wijanarko, Rani Gayatri Kusumawardhani P., Eliza Rosmaya Puri

Abstract


This study aims to identify the priority weight in decision-making in the Sanur Port construction project, which involves various stakeholders with diverse interests and powers. Decisions taken in this project can determine the success of implementation and reduce the impacts caused, especially in dealing with problem situations. The study was conducted using a focus group discussion method involving experts who are experienced in port development. Furthermore, the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) method was used to calculate the priority weight of each stakeholder in decision-making according to expert opinion. The results of the study showed that 11 stakeholders were collected into 4 quadrants in the stakeholder mapping. The highest priority weight is acquired by the project owner (0.5467), JO - planning consultant & contractor (0.2567), and construction management consultant (0.1566), which are in quadrant 1, followed by the local government (0.0900) in quadrant 2, and the affected community (0.0400) which is a combination of quadrants 3 and 4. This finding indicates that in decision-making in the Sanur Port construction project, a diverse approach is needed to minimize losses from each stakeholder. The results of this study are expected to offer insight for decision-makers to understand the dynamics of stakeholders in port construction projects. This understanding will help improve the effectiveness of project management in the future.

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. A. O. Sofiana, N. K. A. K. Saraswati, L. K. A. S. Yanthi, and N. W. Gautama, “Analisis Antrian Loket Pelabuhan Sanur Dengan Model Teori Antrian Melalui Software Anylogic,” Berkala Forum Studi Transportasi antar Perguruan Tinggi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 352–361, May 2024, doi: 10.19184/berkalafstpt.v2i2.1004.

I. M. R. M. Arsha, G. A. D. M. Yoga, and I. M. S. Puja, “JUIMA : Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen KONSEP EKONOMI KERTHI BALI DALAM PARIWISATA BERKELANJUTAN DI DESA ADAT SERANGAN,” JUIMA: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024.

D. Besiktepe, M. E. Ozbek, and R. A. Atadero, “Choosing by Advantages Application Areas in Facilities Management: A Literature Review,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics, 2023. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1176/1/012028.

C. M. Sarungu, “Stakeholder Analysis Using The Enhanced Salience, Power-Interest, and Stakeholder Cube Diagrams,” Ultima Infosys : Jurnal Ilmu Sistem Informasi, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 35, 2024.

P. Simanjuntak and R. Deli Sianturi, “RESOLUSI: Rekayasa Teknik Informatika dan Informasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Dokter Dirumah Sakit Umum Bhakti Dengan Menerapkan Metode Oreste Dan ROC,” Media Online, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 121–127, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://djournals.com/resolusi

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MOOSRA Dalam Penentuan Penerimaan Frontliner Menggunakan Pembobotan Metode ROC,” Jurnal Riset Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 2407–389, 2023, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v10i1.5647.

R. P. Gephart and R. Saylors, “Qualitative Designs and Methodologies for Business, Management, and Organizational Research,” in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, Oxford University Press, 2020. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.230.

W. N. Dunn, Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, 2nd ed. California: Prentice Hall, 2008.

D. Carson, A. Gilmore, C. Perry, and K. Gronhaug, “Focus Group Interviewing,” in Qualitative Marketing Research, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd, 2001, pp. 113–131. doi: 10.4135/9781849209625.n8.

E. Roszkowska, “Rank Ordering Criteria Weighting Methods – a Comparative Overview,” Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, no. 5(65), pp. 14–33, 2013, doi: 10.15290/ose.2013.05.65.02.

A. Sutoni and D. R. Kurniadi, “Analisis Risiko dalam Construction Supply Chain: Studi Kasus pada Proyek Renovasi Gedung Kantor VEDCA,” Jurnal Media Teknik & Sistem Industri, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 81–89, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/index.php/JMTSI

A. Maier and I. Aşchilean, “Importance of stakeholder management for sustainable construction industry,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346717935

J. E. Post, L. E. Preston, and S. Sachs, “Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View,” Calif Manage Rev, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 6–28, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.2307/41166151.

R. E. Freeman and J. McVea, A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In: Hitt, M., Harrison, J., Freeman, R.E. (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2001.

F. Ackermann and C. Eden, “Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice,” Long Range Plann, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 179–196, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31284/j.jasmet.2024.v5i2.6658

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Heru Wijanarko, Rani Gayatri Kusumawardhani P., Eliza Rosmaya Puri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Mailing Address: Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technology - ITATS Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya Jl. Arief Rahman Hakim No.100, Surabaya 60117 email: [email protected] Website : https://ejurnal.itats.ac.id/jasmet/index Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.