Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technology (JASMET) - ISSN 2721-2165 is an international peer-reviewed journal that was launched by LPPM ITATS. It is dedicated to provide a high-level platform in all aspect of science, management and engineering technology where current major research outputs and key achievement of various theories and applications can be disseminated and shared; to report progress in science, discuss novelty, state of the arts, challenges and prospects in engineering and information technology development within consideration of environmental management; to encourage a diverse advanced science breakthroughs and innovation. As our first commitment to the advancement of science, engineering and information technology launch as the open-access journal that freely accessible online.

Section Policies

  1. Articles

Ö         Open Submissions

Ö         Peer Reviewed

  1. Editorial

Ö         Open Submissions

Ö         Peer Reviewed


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The articles published in the JASMET (ISSN 2721-2165) are reviewed first by Peer Reviewers before they are published. The publishing decision of submitted article is determined by the Chief Editor in the Editorial Board forum which is based on recommendations or comments from Peer Reviewers.


Publication Frequency

JASMET (ISSN 2721-2165) is scheduled for publication two times a year in March and September.  It is electronically published via website https://ejurnal.itats.ac.id/jasmet/. Authors are encouraged to submit the article at least two months before the schedule.


Open Access Policy

JASMET (ISSN 2721-2165) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The published articles will be available in Journal TEKNIK website and their full text can be download freely.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...



  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

  1. Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

  1. Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

  1. Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  1. Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

  1. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.



  1. Reporting Standarts

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

  1. Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

  1. Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

  1. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

  1. Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

  1. Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

  1. Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.



Free of charge for Submitting, Processing, and Publishing the Article in JASMET. Authors will be informed on the decision on their manuscript(s) within 1-2 month of submission following the acceptance of their manuscript.



In order to avoid any plagiarism claims on published article in JASMET, the editor urges the authors to ensure that each article to be published does not constitute:

  1. the article has been previously published elsewhere.
  2. the article has been or will be submitted to the patent.

In addition, the plagiarism element check is conducted through Turnitin.



Publication Ethics

Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technologyis a peer-reviewed international journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal as well as allegations of research misconduct, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher (Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.


Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technologyis an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is, therefore, important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya as the publisher of Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technologytakes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Also, the Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.


Allegations of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing the article by authors, or in reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editors and Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them to resolve the complaint and address the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the Editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such misconduct, a retraction can be published and will be linked to the original article.

The first step involves determining the validity of the allegation and an assessment of whether the allegation is consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This initial step also involves determining whether the individuals alleging misconduct have relevant conflicts of interest.

If scientific misconduct or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all of the coauthors, is requested to provide a detailed response. After the response is received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be obtained. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article are sufficient.

Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, and retractions, Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technologywill continue to fulfill the responsibilities of ensuring the validity and integrity of the scientific record.


Publication Decisions

The editor of the Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technologyis responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.


Complaints and Appeals

Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technologywill have a clear procedure for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board or Publisher. The complaints will be clarified to respected personal with respect to the case of complaint. The scope of complaints include anything related to the journal business process, i.e. editorial process, found citation manipulation, unfair editor/reviewer, peer-review manipulation, etc. The complaint cases will be processed according to COPE guideline.


Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.



The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.


Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.




General Instructions

Body of Manuscript, typed in Times New Roman font, size 11 pt, single spaced, A4 paper size (mirrored margin), with top-bottom-inside 3 cm and outside 2 cm borders, and single column. The number of pages is between 6-10 pages. For all the content, please follow the template.

Writing Instructions


Abstract with no more than 250 words should be supplied to reflect the content of the paper in two languages (Indonesian and English). The first abstract to be written is the Indonesian version (title: Abstract, style: Subtitle), italic. A concise and factual abstract is required.


The introduction should discuss several things, namely: 1) Research Background. The importance of the research to be carried out must be stated. 2) Literature review. Explain the previous research related to the current research, then state the position and the difference of the current research with the previous research. 3) Objective and Benefits of research. There are no sub-chapters in the introduction.


Provide sufficient detail methods to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods already published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be described.

Results and Discussion

Results should be clear and concise. Show only the most significant or main findings of the research. Discussion must explore the significance of the results of the work. Adequate discussion or comparison of the current results to the previous similar published articles should be provided to shows the positioning of the present research (if available).


The main conclusion of the study may be presented in a short Conclusions section, which may stand-alone. It should not repeat the Results, instead provide significant findings and contribution of the study.

Acknowledgments (optional)

Provide acknowledgements accordingly. List here those individuals or institutions who gives help, assistance during the research 


All references that referenced in the article must be listed in the references with a minimum number of references in each article 10 references. It must contain 80% of primary sources (scientific journals) published no later than ten years. Reference and citation use IEEE standards. Example 1, from the seminar: [1]. Example 1, from the journal: [2], [3].  If there is a lot of citation, for example, the manufacture of biofuel from plant oil can be done by a catalytic cracking process: [2], [4]–[11]. Citation is required to use a reference management tool, whether using Mendeley, Zotero, or other tools.


Content Licence

Journal of Applied Sciences, Management and Engineering Technology (JASMET) under licence:  Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  • for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.


  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.


Copyright Policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon acceptance of an article by the Journal, the author(s) will be asked to transfer the copyright of the article to the publisher.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

LOCKSS publisher manifest page can be found here