Service Supply Chain Risk Analysis and Control of Port Based on the using HOR Approach

Kevin Gabrianto Rizky Perdana, Sri Gunani Partiwi

Abstract

Ports have an important role in the maritime transportation system but also face various obstacles and threats to different types of risks. Economic conditions and activities that tend to be complex and uncertain such as the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, and geopolitics cause port development and operations to face various challenges and uncertainties.  The ASDP port of the Juata Tarakan ferry has become one of the important parts of community activities to travel from Tarakan island to the surrounding islands such as Tana Tidung and Nunukan. Various studies have been conducted to learn about the operational phases of ports, but not about the overall life cycle. In addition to operational factors, there are environmental factors that still need to be explored in order to avoid failure to distinguish the causes and consequences of risks from risk events. In this study, the process of identification, analysis, and risk mitigation is carried out using a house of risk approach to be able to identify risk events and risk causative agents. This study seeks to explore the risk that is a key component by looking for the relationship between one risk agent and another risk agent and its impact on port companies. Risk prevention actions are discussed in this study in order to be an insight to rethink port risks and design strategic management. The purpose of this study is to help port authorities, especially ASDP ferry, to develop an understanding and management approach to risk from all aspects of the life cycle of the port

Keywords

Risk Management; House of Risk; Port; Supply Chain; Service

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References

P. R. Sinha, L. E. Whitman, and D. Malzahn, “Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 154–168, 2004, doi: 10.1108/13598540410527051.

T. Aven and O. Renn, “On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain,” J Risk Res, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2009, doi: 10.1080/13669870802488883.

P. L. Pallis, “Port Risk Management in Container Terminals,” in Transportation Research Procedia, Elsevier B.V., 2017, pp. 4411–4421. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.337.

E. Hassini, C. Surti, and C. Searcy, “A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics,” Int J Prod Econ, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 69–82, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042.

C. S. Lu, K. C. Shang, and C. C. Lin, “Identifying crucial sustainability assessment criteria for container seaports,” Maritime Business Review, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 90–106, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1108/MABR-05-2016-0009.

World Commision on Environment, “UNITED NATIONS General Assembly.”

AAPA, “Sustainable Design Guidelines AAPA Energy & Environment Seminar,” 2014. [Online]. Available: www.aapa-ports.org

A. Joyce and R. L. Paquin, “The triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models,” J Clean Prod, vol. 135, pp. 1474–1486, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067.

T. Notteboom, “The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chains,” 2009, pp. 25–75. doi: 10.1787/9789282102251-3-en.

D. R. Utama, M. Hamsal, R. K. Rahim, and A. Furinto, “The effect of digital adoption and service quality on business sustainability through strategic alliances at port terminals in Indonesia,” Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 11–21, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2023.12.001.

C. Amin, H. Mulyati, E. Anggraini, and T. Kusumastanto, “Impact of maritime logistics on archipelagic economic development in eastern Indonesia,” Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 157–164, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.01.004.

R. E. E. Freeman and J. McVea, “A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management,” SSRN Electronic Journal, Jul. 2005, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.263511.

G. T. Savage and J. D. Blair, “Article in Academy of Management Perspectives,” 1991, doi: 10.2307/4165008.

M. B. E. Clarkson, “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance,” 1995. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/258888

UNCTAD, “UNCTAD(1994); port marketing and the challenge of the third generation port,” 1992.

F. Russo and G. Musolino, “The Role of Emerging ICT in the Ports: Increasing Utilities According to Shared Decisions,” Frontiers in Future Transportation, vol. 2, 2021, doi: 10.3389/ffutr.2021.722812.

T. Kusmantini, A. Djoko, G. Heru, and C. Rustamaji, “Mapping of Supply Chain Risk in Industrial Furniture Base on House of Risk Framework,” Online, 2015. [Online]. Available: www.iiste.org

M. Goh, J. Y. S. Lim, and F. Meng, “A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks,” Eur J Oper Res, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 164–173, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.028.

J. Schulte and S. Knuts, “Sustainability impact and effects analysis - A risk management tool for sustainable product development,” Sustain Prod Consum, vol. 30, pp. 737–751, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.004.

United States Defense Department, “MILITARY STANDARD PROCEDURES FOR PERFORMING A FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRlTlCALliV ANALYSIS l=SC RELI,” 1980.

I. N. Pujawan and L. H. Geraldin, “House of risk: A model for proactive supply chain risk management,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 953–967, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1108/14637150911003801.

S. Taljaard, J. H. Slinger, S. P. Weerts, H. S. I. Vreugdenhil, and C. Nzuza, “Circles of port sustainability: A novel method combining global comparability and local relatability in performance assessment,” Environ Dev, vol. 52, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101068.

J. Kwesi-Buor, D. A. Menachof, and R. Talas, “Scenario analysis and disaster preparedness for port and maritime logistics risk management,” Accid Anal Prev, vol. 123, pp. 433–447, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.013.

N. N. Rodhi, “Human Resource Risk Management in Construction Services Companies in Bojonegoro 68,” 2025, doi: 10.31284/j.jtm.2025.v6i2.7803.

Denktas-Sakar Gul and Karatas-Cetin Cimen, “Port Sustainability and Stakeholder Management in Supply Chains: A Framework on Resource Dependence Theory,” Dec. 2012.

N. Wang, W. Mu, and R. Ma, “A Systematic understanding of the risk development process for port authority,” Mar Policy, vol. 167, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106243.

M. A. Budiyanto and H. Fernanda, “Risk assessment of work accident in container terminals using the fault tree analysis method,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 8, no. 6, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/JMSE8060466.

S. Goksu and O. Arslan, “A quantitative dynamic risk assessment for ship operation using the fuzzy FMEA: The case of ship berthing/unberthing operation,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 287, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115548.

J. Sayareh, “Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for Reducing the Delays of Cargo Handling Operations in Marine Bulk Terminals,” Jun. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269370378

T. Yanjun, “Study on audit of corporate financial risk based on FMEA method,” Available online www.jocpr.com Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 616–621, 2014, [Online]. Available: www.jocpr.com

W. Huo, P. Shu-Ling Chen, W. Zhang, and K. X. Li, “International port investment of Chinese port-related companies,” 2019.

C. I. Chlomoudis, P. Kostagiolas, P. A. Kostagiolas, and P. L. Pallis, “An Analysis of Formal Risk Assessments for Safety and Security in Ports: Empirical Evidence from Container Terminals in Greece,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241685051

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31284/j.jtm.2026.v7i1.8079

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.