Optimizing Railway Track Management through Life Cycle Cost Analysis: A Comprehensive Review

Rachmad Indrakusuma, Bagus Budiwantoro, Satrio Wicaksono

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive examination of Life Cycle Cost (LCC) analysis as applied to railway track systems, with a focus on optimizing the economic and operational performance of railway infrastructure over its entire lifespan. The study begins with an exploration of existing LCC models and their applications in railway track analysis, highlighting the importance of LCC as a decision-making tool for infrastructure management. It then delves into the integration of degradation models for key track components such as ballast, rails, and sleepers, and how these models contribute to a more accurate and effective LCC analysis.

The paper further reviews several case studies to illustrate the practical application of LCC analysis in real-world scenarios. These include an analysis of alternative railway track support materials for the Sydney Harbour Bridge, an evaluation of the slab track monoblock sleeper system for the Indonesian Urban Metro Railway Project under uncertainty, and a life cycle cost, energy, and carbon assessment of the Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway. Each case study provides insights into the methodologies used for LCC analysis and the resulting implications for railway infrastructure management.

The findings of this paper underscore the significance of LCC analysis in guiding the maintenance and renewal policies of railway tracks, ensuring cost-effectiveness while maintaining safety and reliability. The paper concludes with recommendations for the adoption of advanced LCC models and maintenance strategies, emphasizing the need for future research to address uncertainties in system performance and to further refine these models for enhanced decision-making in railway track management.

Keywords

life cycle cost, railway

Full Text:

PDF

References

L. Chen and Q. Bai, “Optimization in decision making in infrastructure asset management: A review,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 7, p. 1380, 2019.

S. E. Hashemian, Y. Shafahi, and F. Moghaddasnezhad, “Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of railway tracks maintenance decisions using the Markov forecast model based on the track recording machine data,” Amirkabir J. Civ. Eng., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 555–574, 2021.

A. Jankowski, “Optimization of risk management by life cycle costing and application to the European train control system.” Braunschweig, Techn. Univ., Diss., 2006, 2006.

A. R. Andrade, “Renewal decisions from a Life-cycle Cost (LCC) Perspective in Railway Infrastructure: An integrative approach using separate LCC models for rail and ballast components,” Lisbon Univ. Técnica Lisboa, 2008.

J. Hamalwa, “The use of life cycle cost analysis in determining the cost effectiveness of railway lines’ design and maintenance options for railway lines through windblown sandy desert in Namibia: Case study of the Aus-Luderitz railway line.” University of Namibia, 2019.

M. Sol-Sánchez, F. Moreno-Navarro, and M. C. Rubio-Gámez, “The use of elastic elements in railway tracks: A state of the art review,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 75, pp. 293–305, 2015.

R. Francis and B. Bekera, “A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 121, pp. 90–103, 2014.

A. Kasraei and J. Ali Zakeri, “Maintenance decision support model for railway track geometry maintenance planning using cost, reliability, and availability factors: a case study,” Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 2676, no. 7, pp. 161–172, 2022.

A. Jabłoński and M. Jabłoński, Digital Safety in Railway Transport: Aspects of Management and Technology. Springer, 2022.

L. F. Caetano and P. F. Teixeira, “Optimisation model to schedule railway track renewal operations: a life-cycle cost approach,” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1524–1536, 2015.

S. Senaratne, O. Mirza, T. Dekruif, and C. Camille, “Life cycle cost analysis of alternative railway track support material: A case study of the Sydney harbour bridge,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 276, p. 124258, 2020.

M. Berawi, P. L. Wicaksono, P. M. Gunawan, and H. A. Rahman, “Life Cycle Cost Analysis of the Transit Oriented Development Concept in Indonesia,” Life, vol. 10, no. 6, 2019.

M. Feng, C. Wu, and S. Lu, “A New Operation-Oriented Mixed Integer Linear Programming Model for Energy-Efficient Train Operations,” in 2020 10th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES), Dec. 2020, pp. 350–355. doi: 10.1109/ICPES51309.2020.9349630.

L. F. Caetano and P. F. Teixeira, “Optimisation model to schedule railway track renewal operations: a life-cycle cost approach,” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1524–1536, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1080/15732479.2014.982133.

S. Kaewunruen, J. Sresakoolchai, and J. Peng, “Life Cycle Cost, Energy and Carbon Assessments of Beijing-Shanghai High-Speed Railway,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 206, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su12010206.

D. W. P. Griffin, O. Mirza, K. C. S. Kwok, and S. Kaewunruen, “Finite Element Modelling of Modular Precast Composites for Railway Track Support Structure: A Battle to Save Sydney Harbour Bridge,” Aust. J. Struct. Eng., vol. 16, pp. 150–168, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:111061332

A. Polyanskiy, “Adaptive digital technological regulations development for engineering and intellectual support for the railway track facilities construction,” Russ. J. Transp. Eng., 2022, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:251363842

S. Kaewunruen, D. W. P. Griffin, O. Mirza, and K. C. S. Kwok, “RESILIENCE-BASED DESIGN OF PRECAST STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITES FOR RAILWAY TRACK SLABS,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55961617

J. Lin, H. Li, W. Huang, W. A. Xu, and S. Cheng, “A Carbon Footprint of High‐Speed Railways in China: A Case Study of the Beijing‐Shanghai Line,” J. Ind. Ecol., vol. 23, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:158452258

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.