Analisis Risiko Usaha Jasa Konsultan Pengawas Proyek Konstruksi di Surabaya

Tian Rifaldi

Abstract

Construction project business has high risks. In Supervisory Consulting Services, risks can arise in the several fields; like marketing, production, and resources. The aim of this study was identifying, analyzing, responding, or controlling of dominant risks in the Supervisory Consultant Services. The data collection techniques used questionnaire and interviews with respondents. They were personals from Supervising Consultant. Data analysis used Severity Index method which was combined with the multiplication of probability and impact. Respond was carried out to the dominant risks and the categories were unacceptable and undesirable categories. For the result, there were 3 unacceptable risks and 4 undesirable risks. The risk respond was reducing the risks. Unacceptable risk category were late payment terms, poor document control, and design changes. The response was carried out by preparing documents for payment terms, conducting a review of the design before the construction process, facilitating personnel with equipment to support supervision. Undesirable risk category were inappropriate qualification documents, low progress, findings by the audit team, and lack of team work. Responses are carried out by compiling qualifications and participating in auctions according to sub-sectors, evaluating the schedule with acceleration methods, compiling technical and non-technical administrative reports for any changes, and building good communication within the team.

Keywords

Risk, Supervisory Consultant, Controlling

Full Text:

PDF

References

[ 1 ] Asiyanto, “Manajemen Risiko Untuk Kontraktor”, Pradyna Paramita. Jakarta, 2009.

[ 2 ] Peraturan Lembaga Jasa Konstruksi Nasional Nomor 04 Tahun 2017 tentang Sertifikasi dan Registrasi Jasa Perencana dan Pengawas Konstruksi.

[ 3 ] Feri Harianto, Eka Susanti, dan M.Z Sabarudin,”Analisis Risiko Kecelakaan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Pada Pembangunan Apartemen Educity Residence Pakuwon City Surabaya”, Aplikasi Teknologi Prasarana Wilayah X, Vol 2, pp. E-73, 2014.

[ 4 ] Feri Harianto, Nadjadji Anwar, I Putu Artama Wiguna, dan Erma Suryani, “ Conceptual System Dynamic Model OSH Performance Improment of Building Construction Projects”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Construction, Infrastructure, and Materials, pp. 441-448, 2022.

[ 5 ] Feri Harianto dan Mintoro, “Risk Analysis Work Accidents on The Implementation of Toll Road Project Surabaya-Mojokerto”, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(14) special edition, Indonesia, pp. 65-69, 2014.

[ 6 ] Azhari, “Faktor-Faktor Risiko Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Kontraktor Pada Pelaksanaan Proyek Infrastruksur Di Kabupaten Aceh Jaya”, Jurnal Teknik Sipil Pasca Sarjana Universitas Syiah Kuala, Volume 3, No.1, Februari 2014, Teknik Sipil, Universitas Syiah Kuala Aceh, 2014.

[ 7 ] Hendi Kurniawan & Ida Ayu Ari Anggraeni, “Analisis Risiko Rantai Pasok Material Terhadap Keterlambatan Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi”, Rekayasa Sipil, Vol 14, No 1, pp.43-50, 2020.

[ 8 ] Lazuardi Gagah M, Widi Hartono, dan Sugiyarto,” Analisa Pengaruh Risiko Pada Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Terhadap Biaya Pekerjaan (Studi Kasus: Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Tol Bogor Ring Road Seksi IIA)”, Matriks Teknik Sipil, Vol 3, No 2, 2015.

[ 9 ] Godfrey, “A Systematic Approach to Risk Management for Construction”, Construction Industry Reseach and Information Associatio, London, 1996.

[ 10 ] Ida Bagus Ngurah Purbawijaya, “Identifikasi dan Penilaian Risiko Pada Proyek Condotel Watu Jimbar Sanur”, Tesis, Universitas Udayana, Bali, 2018.

[ 11 ] Imam Nur Maliki, “Evaluasi Faktor-Faktor Dominan Risiko Teknis Pelaksanaan Proyek Jember Icon Tahap Dua Dengan Metode Severity Index”, Tesis. Sarjana Teknik Sipil, Universitas Jember, Jember, 2016.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.