Computational Fluid Dynamic for Performance Hydrofoil due to Angle of Attack

Maria Margareta Zau Beu


This study uses a 2-D computational fluid dynamic (CFD) with a hydrofoil object. The general parameters used are pressure-based with Reynold numbers (Re) 106. The Pressure velocity coupling method used is SIMPLE with Reynold k-? as the viscous model on ANSYS Fluent 2019R1. The angle of attack variations are used starting from 00, 20, 40, 60, 10, 120, 150, 200, 250, and 300. From the simulation shows the hydrofoil characters depicted in the Coefficient drag (CD), Coefficient Lift (CL) and Pressure graphs Coefficient (CP) approaches the experimental results.


Computational fluid dynamic (CFD), hydrofoil, angle of attack (AoA)

Full Text:



Müller, J. D. (2015). Essentials of computational fluid dynamics. In Essentials of Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Zau Beu, M. M., & Kusuma, I. P. A. I. (2017). Investigasi Numerik VIV (Vortex Induced Vibration) Pada Diameter Kabel Hydrophone 0.04 M Sistem Akustik Bawah Air. ROTOR, 10(2), 47.

Pranatal, E., & Beu, M. M. Z. (2018). Analisa CFD Penggunaan Duct pada Turbin Kombinasi Darrieus-Savonius. Jurnal IPTEK.

Marchand, J. B., Astolfi, J. A., & Bot, P. (2017). Discontinuity of lift on a hydrofoil in reversed flow for tidal turbine application. European Journal of Mechanics, B/Fluids, 63, 90–99.

Liu, Z., Qu, H., & Shi, H. (2019). Performance evaluation and enhancement of a semi-activated flapping hydrofoil in shear flows. Energy, 189, 116255.

Stern, F., Wang, Z., Yang, J., Sadat-Hosseini, H., Mousaviraad, M., Bhushan, S., Grenestedt, J. L. (2015). Recent progress in CFD for naval architecture and ocean engineering. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 27(1), 1–23.

Putranto, T., & Sulisetyono, A. (2017). Lift-drag coefficient and form factor analyses of hydrofoil due to the shape and angle of attack. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(21), 11152–11156

Amini, Y., Kianmehr, B., & Emdad, H. (2019). Dynamic stall simulation of a pitching hydrofoil near free surface by using the volume of fluid method. Ocean Engineering.

ANSYS-Fluent 2019R1 software

Elmekawy, A. N., Introduction to ANSYS Meshing Module-01

Wu, J. T., Chen, J. H., Hsin, C. Y., & Chiu, F. C. (2019). Dynamics of the FKT System with Different Mooring Lines. Polish Maritime Research, 26(1), 20–29.

Vandoormaal, J.P., Raithby, G.D., 1984. Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flows. Numer. Heat Transf. 7, 147–163.

Dagestad, I. (2018). Actuation moments for hydrofoil flaps, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Marine Technology

Newman, J. N., (1977). Marine Hydrodynamics, MIT.

White, F.M., 2011. Fluid Mechanics, seventh ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

Giesing, J.P., Smith, A.M.O., 1967. Potential flow about two-dimensional hydrofoils. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 113–129

Ni, Z., Dhanak, M., & Su, T. chow. (2019). Performance of a slotted hydrofoil operating close to a free surface over a range of angles of attack. Ocean Engineering, 188(June), 106296.

Bai, K.J., 1978. A localized finite-element method for two-dimensional steady potential flows with a free surface. J. Ship Res. 22, 216–230.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Journal of Earth and Marine Technology (JEMT) published by LPPM-ITATS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at

ISSN: 2723-8105 (LIPI)


Indexed by:



Cooperated with:



suggested use of reference manager, similarity check, and proofread