Analysis of RBS Chrome's Employee Preparedness Conditions Against Fire Threats

. Fire is an event where a fire is not where it should be, resulting in material or life losses and can occur anywhere. Fatal fires are those that occur in the industrial sector because they will disrupt operational and production activities. The purpose of this study is to analyse employee preparedness for facilities or infrastructure from the protection system in RBS CHROME and find out the comparison of the preparedness of production employees and management employees to fire hazards in RBS CHROME. This type of research is descriptive quantitative. The design of this study used a list of questions as a guideline for interviews and field observations. The list of questions to informants of the study was carried out on 3 groups of employees, namely production employees and management employees of RBS CHROME. Field observation of facilities or infrastructure using a checklist sheet that refers to a ministerial regulation. The results of this study show that RBS CHROME has provided facilities or facilities for fire disaster preparedness, but employees who are in the RBS CHROME office do not understand and are not prepared for fire disasters


Introduction
Disasters are extraordinary events in which the resources, personal or material in the area around the disaster are unable to control these extraordinary events that can threaten people's lives caused by natural factors, non-natural factors, or human factors that cause human casualties, environmental damage, property losses, and psychologic impacts (Nurjanah R, 2019). tissue, wet wipes, handkerchief or you can use the top you are wearing. Inhalation of fire smoke can result in loss of consciousness leading to death. Follow the Evacuation Instructions, follow the directions of the evacuation route attached to the walls of the workshop.
Law no. 24 of 2007 states, preparedness is a series of activities carried out in the form of efforts to anticipate disasters through organizing through appropriate and effective scarcity. (Ministry of Health, 2005). Fire preparedness is an effort carried out to anticipate fire disasters so that when a fire disaster occurs, they can take appropriate and effective actions (Rahayu, 2009). The purpose of preparedness is to minimize or reduce side effects due to fire hazards with appropriate, adequate, efficient, effective and emergency response precautions for disaster relief (Martanto, 2017). The following are the factors that are able to influence employee preparedness in the face of fire disasters according to (Patuju, 2018) namely as follows: 1. Simulation and socialization training in fire disaster management 2. Supporting protection system as an effort to prepare an early warning system instrument 3. Preparation of contingency plans.

Research Methods
The method used in this study is descriptive-quantitative. This research is an observational type of research that aims to analyze fire protection systems as an effort to mitigate fire disasters in RBS CHROME. The object of this study is the fire protection system in the metal plating industry Ria Berkat Sejahtera Chrome (RBS CHROME) which consists of an active fire protection system. As well as identifying comparisons of fire disaster preparedness from production employees and management employees at RBS CHROME. The respondents in this study were production employees and management employees at RBS CHROME totaling 38 people, namely 19 production employees and 19 management employees. The selection of respondents is based on different places or positions regarding the magnitude of the mains voltage in the work environment and the range of evacuation routes to the rescue facility This research was conducted at the RBS CHROME workshop starting from April 2021 to February 2022 with data collection in May 2022. This research is field research with a cross-sectional research design because observations are made at one time. To identify comparisons of fire preparedness for disasters from production employees and management employees at RBS CHROME using a reference from the number of samples in this study was 38 respondents. The instrument used is a questionnaire of protection systems, knowledge and preparedness attitudes made by researchers themselves by modifying a questionnaire from Ahmad Saifulloh on the Relationship of Knowledge and Attitudes with Fire Preparedness in Employees at the Copyright Building of the Ministry of Transportation in 2018 (Ahmad, 2018). This questionnaire has been tested for validity with a calculated r value (0.406-0.648) > 0.329, and a reliability value of 0.744.
As for employee preparedness for facilities or infrastructure from the protection system in RBS CHROME , the conformity level assessment is based on National Standards, namely  The data that has been collected is then processed descriptively, namely describing the object under study by comparing the suitability based on THE PU Regulation No.26 / PRT / M / 2008 NFPA then presented in the form of tables and narratives so as to facilitate the reading of the results of the research carried out.

Results and Discussion
Employee preparedness for facilities or infrastructure from the protection system in RBS CHROME The active fire protection system in the RBS CHROME office building consists of a fire alarm, detector, sprinkler, fire extinguisher and hydrant. All such elements are identified by observation. an alarm suitability rate of 80%, the placement of alarms is placed on each floor so that building users can easily hear the sound of the alarm, besides that the predetermined positions are clearly visible and not blocked by other objects which means Good. There are as many as 2 pieces, each such alarm is located on the wall close to the door.
The detectors in the RBS CHROME workshop building are 4 pieces. All of these detectors are routinely checked at the beginning of each month since they were first installed by technicians because they include a maintanance agenda or monthly routine checks. The detector is very important to detect the presence of heat, in the event of a fire the detector can detect the presence of fire through the sound of an alarm so that the fire is quickly overcome. According to (Kurniawan, 2014) states that the detector system has a fairly good fulfillment level which means it is installed but there is a small part of the installation that is not in accordance with the requirements of The available hydrant boxes are easy to open, view, and reach. The hydrant box is painted red with the words hydrant painted in white. However, in the box there are no good and correct instructions for using the hydrant so it cannot be used quickly at any time. We recommend that the hydrant box be paid more attention to make it easy for the operation of the hydrant. The hydrants in RBS CHROME are pressurized an average of 8 bar at all locations. Observation results based on the table of the degree of conformity of the protection system active fires showed 65% with less categories, meaning that elements were installed but most were not in compliance with applicable standards.
Comparison of the preparedness of production employees and management employees to fire hazards in RBS CHROME 1.

Level of Understanding of Evacuation Routes and The Use and Location of Fire Protection Systems
Employee preparedness is divided into three, namely the level of understanding of evacuation routes and the use and location of fire protection systems, facilities and infrastructure (disaster warning systems) and preparedness (emergency plans) between employees in RBS Chrome. RBS CHROME employees consist of 38 people, 19 production employees and 19 management employees. The number of questionnaire questions for understanding evacuation routes and the use and location of fire protection systems consists of 5 questions for each employee. Based on the results of the man whitney proportion test in the table, it is obtained if the value of Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.882 is greater than > probability of 0.05. Therefore, as the basis for the man-whitney test decision-making above, it can be concluded that H1(rejected) is thus found that the majority or most of the employees do not understand the evacuation route and do not know the use and location of the fire protection system in RBS Chrome.
Reviewing the results of the answers from the questionnaire given to respondents, the majority of employees, both production and management employees, still do not understand the understanding of evacuation routes and the use and location of fire protection systems which include knowledge and attitudes in appropriate self-rescue actions when a fire occurs.

Employee Preparedness Level for Facilities or Infrastructure from the Protection System in RBS Chrome
The number of questions for the facilities and infrastructure questionnaire (disaster warning system) consists of 2 questions for each employee. The results were obtained from the tabulation of the questionnaire that had been analyzed using SPSS with the Anova One way formula. In the table above, the difference in the level of employee preparedness for facilities or infrastructure is presented on average between production employees and management employees with exposure to production employees having an average of 14.74 while management employees have an average of 14.21. So descriptively it can be concluded that the average employee preparedness is the highest, namely production employees. The results of the one-way anova test are known to be sig at 0.817> 0.05, so it can be concluded that the average population of the two employees does not differ significantly.
Looking at the results of the questionnaire answers given to respondents where the population of the two employees did not differ significantly in the level of preparedness of the facilities or infrastructure of the protection system in RBS Chrome in self-rescue as well as the response and completeness needed before a fire.

Conclusion
Based on the results carried out in the research and discussion presented, it can be concluded that the fire protection system in the RBS CHROME workshop is included in the sufficient category (C) WHICH IS 60%, Items that are not suitable are sprinkles. In the result of the man whitney proportion test states that the value of Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.882 is greater than < probability of 0.05. Therefore, based on the decision making the man-whitney test concluded that H1(rejected) and it can be stated that most employees do not understand the evacuation route and do not know the use and location of the fire protection system in RBS Chrome. The one-way anova test showed a sig result of 0.817> 0.05, so it was concluded that the average of the two employee populations did not have a significant difference. Knowing the result of the one-way sig anova test is 0.895 > 0.05, so it can be concluded that the average of the two employees has no significant difference.

Suggestion
From the research conducted, there are several suggestions that are recommended, including equipping the facilities and facilities of the fire protection system with standards and provisions set by regulations. We recommend that RBS CHROME add a sprinkler system that has a network and clean water supply that is free of mud and sand, the sprinkler head is in good condition not blocked by other objects, automatically connected to the fire alarm, the distance between sprinklers is not more than 4.6 conducting inspections and trials at least once every 1 year. We recommend that periodic inspections or inspections be carried out, which is once every 1 month for the workplace environment, especially in the RBS CHROME warehouse. Collaborating with external parties to carry out simulated fire emergencies and make training to increase knowledge and provide certificates as a sign if employees have disaster mitigation capabilities in a fire hazard. Provide a reward system for employees who obey the rules regarding fire hazards to be a positive example / reference for other employees.