Sistem Dinamik Ujian Nasional Berbasis Komputer Untuk Meminimalkan Resiko Kecurangan Serta Meningkatkan Efektifitas Dan Efisiensi Anggaran

Rachman Arief, Erma Suryani

Abstract


The Ministry of Education Indonesia held a national examination for high school students every year with the aim of assessing the achievement of competency standards on specific subjects nationally and as the basis of selection into the next education level. Fraud in paper-based  implementation of National Examination often found, although it can not be completely eliminated but it can be minimized. National Exam-based computer is one of the policies that can be used to reduce the risk of fraud or violations committed by students, teacher, schools and others who intentionally used for a particular purpose. National Exam-based computer will also improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the budget, because it does not use paper media that will be replaced with computer media and its oversight will be easier. In this research scenario will be simulated implementation of National Examination using a computer-based modeling of dynamic systems. Hopefully, through modeling of dynamic systems can be known factors that cause fraud or breach, as well as a variable in the National Exam that can be analyzed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the budget, so the goal of the National Examination can be achieved in order to improve the quality of education in Indonesia.


Full Text:

PDF

References


A Review of System Dynamics Models of Educational Policy Issues. (2005, April 15). London, United Kingdom: System Dynamics Society.

Akdemir, O., & Oguz, A. (2008). Computer-based testing: An alternative for the assessment of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education , 1198–1204.

Akuntono, I. (2015, Mei 5). Kemendikbud Tekan Kecurangan UN dengan Indeks Integritas. Dipetik Maret 18, 2016, dari Kompas.com: http://nasional.kompas.com/

Alawiyah, F. (2012, Mei). Pelaksanaan Ujian Nasional 2012 . Jakarta, DKI Jakarta: (P3DI) Setjen DPR RI.

Girardi, D., Giacomello, B., & Gentili, L. (2013, Desember 15). Budgeting Models and System Simulation: A Dynamic Approach. SSRN Konpers

Pemanfaatan Hasil UN. (2015, Mei 18). Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.

Matindas, R. (2010). Mencegah kecurangan akademik. Dipetik Juli 2016, dari http://budimatindas.blogspot.com/2010/08/mencegah-kecurangan-akademik.html

Mingat, A., & Tan, J.-P. (2003). Tools for Education Policy Analysis. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The Word Bank.

Nirmalakhandan, N. (2013). Improving problem-solving skills of undergraduates through computerized dynamic assessment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 615 – 621. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 75 Pasal 1 ayat 1. (2009, Oktober 13). Ujian Nasional Sekolah Menengah . Jakarta, Indonesia.

Piaw, C. Y. (2012). Replacing paper-based testing with computer-based testing in assessment: Are we doing wrong? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 655 – 664.

Piaw, C. Y., & Mohd, Z. D. (2013). Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers motivation. Computers in Human Behavior , 1889–1895.

POS Penyelenggaraan UN. (2015, Desember 22). Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Rohma, F. (2013). Kecurangan Ujian dalam Nasional. Artikel Ilmiah Hasil Penelitian Mahasiswa 2013 , 4.

Sosialisasi Penyelenggaraan UN. (2015, Desember 30). Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Sosialisasi UN. (2015, Februari 25). Penggandaan, Pendistribusian, dan Pengelolaan Dana Bahan UN . Jakarta, Indonesia: Balitbang Kemdikbud.

Strom, P. S. (2007, Januari 30). The Educational Forum. Cheating in Middle School and High School .London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

Survei UPI: Pengalaman UN 2004-2013. (2013, Oktober 2). Dipetik Maret 18, 2016, dari SuaraPembaruan: http://sp.beritasatu.com/

Suryani, E. (2006). Pemodelan dan Simulasi.Jogjakarta: Graha Ilmu.Terzis, V., N. Moridis, C., & A.Economides, A. (2012). How student’s personality traits affect


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.